You inspire with every breath you take.

Claim reads, "when you breathe, you inspire". Claim doesn't read, "You inspire with every breath you take".

I understand now. When I saw your comment on the inspiring claim, I thought that you were unaware of the second definition of "inspire". Now I see that you don't understand the first definition either.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Excuse me? Do you know how the first definition applies to the first part of the inspirant? Or are you just trying to be an ass?

Ralph, I bow to your subtlety. I just can't stop smiling now. Life is good.

"When you breathe, you inspire."

This is abstract. It means: When you exist, you inspire.

"When you do not breathe, you expire."

This is concrete. It means: When you stop breathing, you cease to exist.

I agreed with the claim because it is true when read literally and true when interpreted in abstract.

I appreciate the claim because it supports my belief that something exists if it inspires and that something inspires if it exists.

Lul.

Taken literally: this claim reads, "You inhale with every breath you take."

Ok. Not nearly as profound or thought-provoking as the inspirant because it's obviously true.

I thought Sting's bird inspired that one.

Ralph: You really do.

D'A
... such a suck-up